Theology

October 09, 2007

Omit, delete, ignore - and read the little words!

Here's something from our Heart and Mind session the other day. I'm putting it up here because I think there are some important guidelines we mentioned which deserve a wider audience.

We were looking at the Book of Romans, and focused in on chapter 1, verses 14 to the end of the chapter.

Those verses have often been read - and often still are - as a bit of a diatribe against the human tendency to sin, especially towards sexual sin. (It's apparent that this text is still being read in this way if you look as some of the more immoderate expressions in the current debate on sexuality across the Anglican Communion!)

James Alison, in his excellent, thought-provoking book "Undergoing God", points out (and I paraphrase!) that this is not the only, or even the most natural, reading of the text.

Putting it simply, he suggests that Paul is drawing his readers or listeners - and particularly his Jewish Christian listeners or readers - into a position where they find themselves fulminating against the vices of others, and especially others they do not like or agree with.

James Alison points out various principles of reading which lead his to this conclusion.

First - ignore what Paul (or whoever) did not write! Since we know Paul wrote all of Romans, this can only mean... the verse numbers, chapter numbers and paragraphs!

This is how our earliest copies of the New Testament look:

Nttext

No verses, no paragraphs, no chapters. All written in uncial (basically capital) letters. No punctuation!

So what does this mean, here? It means: don't stop reading at the end of chapter 1! Just because there is a chapter break there, it doesn't necessarily mean that Paul has finished his argument.

Second - look out for tiny keywords! And - what do you know? - there's one of them at the very beginning of Romans chapter 2. "Therefore...", Paul writes. Where there's a "therefore", you can be sure that Paul was linking up what he's now saying with what came before. And that means that Paul's discussion hasn't stopped at the end of chapter 1, but carries on into chapter 2. And it means that Paul's BIG POINT, the climax of his argument, is coming now, in the first verses of chapter 2.

Here's what he writes:

"Therefore you have no excuse, whoever you are, when you judge others; for in passing judgement on another you condemn yourself, because you, the judge, are doing the very same things..."

This means (according to James Alison - and I'm pretty convinced, myself) that this whole passage is not a diatribe against sin, but a warning against Paul's readers/hearers not to judge others, or to assume that they are themselves without fault. As Paul says in Romans 3:23: "all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God..."

So: a radically different reading - and all because we remembered to ignore the markings in the text (which are a later, only sometimes helpful, imposition) and take more note of link words.

Worth remembering as we read?

May 19, 2007

Atonement revisited

The theory of the atonement often called "penal substitution" has justifiably been under some scrutiny lately. It claims that Jesus died as an innocent victim in our place to appease or satisfy the wrath of an angry God...

Continue reading "Atonement revisited" »

May 01, 2007

Christianity and other beliefs

Becky, someone I know from outside the parish, has sent me an encouraging email, with some questions in it. Here's an excerpt (with her permission)...

I've been reading this blog, and I've found it very interesting. I don't currently consider myself to be a Christian, I have my own set of beliefs, but I've often thought that Christian spirituality isn't very far from my own. One of the main things that put me off Christianity was the idea that it was very 'set in stone' when it came to religious texts, and that it was very dogmatic. I admit I'm rather ignorant of the contents of the bible. I know the New Testament better than the Old, and what I do know is from my childhood. Anyway, its enlightening to find that my perceptions were short-sighted.  I always wondered what theologians studied.....

I can't say that I am a Christian, but definitely inspired to find out more. And so I have some questions:...

Continue reading "Christianity and other beliefs" »

April 20, 2007

Creationism Disneyworld

Dean has written a great blog on Creationism and its questionable methods of interpretation here. Well worth a read!

April 07, 2007

Preaching (1): Mind the Gap

Alan le Grys led us in a very searching and thought-provoking Good Friday Three Hours' Devotion yesterday, and has set me thinking again about one aspect of the task of preaching - an aspect I have been reflecting on for some time now, from the point of view of someone who preaches regularly in the same church context...

Continue reading "Preaching (1): Mind the Gap" »

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Books worth reading...

Church community photos

  • www.flickr.com
    This is a Flickr badge showing photos in a set called Christ Church Barbecue 2007. Make your own badge here.

Interesting Links...

Powered by TypePad